<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Digital Humanities Questions &#38; Answers &#187; Topic: What are essential introductory theorizations of the Model?</title>
		<link>http://digitalhumanities.org/answers/topic/what-are-essential-introductory-theorizations-of-the-model</link>
		<description>Digital Humanities Questions &amp; Answers &#187; Topic: What are essential introductory theorizations of the Model?</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 22:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://digitalhumanities.org/answers/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="/rss/topic/what-are-essential-introductory-theorizations-of-the-model/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			 
				<title>Michael Ullyot on "What are essential introductory theorizations of the Model?"</title>
						<link>http://digitalhumanities.org/answers/topic/what-are-essential-introductory-theorizations-of-the-model#post-2036</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Michael Ullyot</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2036@http://digitalhumanities.org/answers/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I'd like to ask both a research and a teaching question, about the most productive *and* accessible theorizations of the Model in artistic, scientific, and in-between disciplines like ours.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm teaching a course (this fall) in my university's interdisciplinary arts-and-science undergraduate program on the very broad theme of 'representation.' I'm comparing the relationships between scientific theories, artistic representations, and quantitative/tractable models of research objects (in any field) that make them computationally addressable. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The question is this: which essays or articles would best introduce these advanced undergraduates to the third category? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Willard McCarty's essay, &#34;Modeling: a study in words and meanings&#34; from *A companion to digital humanities* (2004), is cited in Matt Burton's &#34;Joy of Topic Modeling&#34; blog post last month &#38;lt; &#60;a href=&#34;http://mcburton.net/blog/joy-of-tm/&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://mcburton.net/blog/joy-of-tm/&#60;/a&#62; &#38;gt;. This seems the natural place to start, but I wonder if readers have used other texts to induce intelligent non-specialists to join, or at least to grasp, our field.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;These are my other texts:&#60;br /&#62;
* David Bohm, *On Creativity*&#60;br /&#62;
* Virginia Woolf, *The Waves* (and Stephen Ramsay's work on the same)&#60;br /&#62;
* Richard Dawkins, *The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing*&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;With thanks,&#60;br /&#62;
Michael Ullyot
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
