jennriley
Member
What humanities disciplines have published recommendations/guidelines/statements for how to evaluate digital work in their area? I do know the big ones: MLA (http://www.mla.org/resources/documents/rep_it/guidelines_evaluation_digital) and the AHA guidance on evaluating public historians, which is intersected with but not wholly digital work (http://ncph.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/Engaged-Historian.pdf). What others are out there?
Thanks,
Jenn
Replying to @jennriley's post: While not including many examples from scholarly societies, UF folks compiled many resources related to supporting evaluation of digital scholarship here: http://cms.uflib.ufl.edu/DigitalHumanities/PeerReviewAlternativeScholarlyProducts.aspx
The University of Nebraska-Lincoln's evaluation page (http://cdrh.unl.edu/articles/eval_digital_scholar.php) and Texas A&M's (http://idhmc.tamu.edu/commentpress/digital-scholarship/) are also great examples of how institutions are developing resources to meet the same needs, which may also be of interest/use.
You must log in to post.
A project of the Association for Computers and the Humanities and the Chronicle of Higher Education's ProfHacker
Icons by famfamfam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
